A new kind of care experience — vision, hearing and confidence, considered around you. Book an appointment →
Book Appointment

Lenses · Honest limits

What we won't recommend — and why.

The five things our Lens Profile is built to say no to.

A recommendation is only worth having if the same process can also say no. The STOTTS. Lens Profile is built with five refusals written into it — each with a plain condition, and each in the same words the profile uses on your result. They are printed here so you can hold us to them.

This page is not an eye test — any change in your vision is an examination first.

01

A pair just for the computer

What it would otherwise have been: STOTTS. Screen

We would not change

A dedicated computer pair

“Screens aren't a big enough part of your day to justify a pair of their own.”

When it says this: You use screens for under about three hours a day, with none of the tell-tale habits — lifting the chin, turning the head between screens, hunting for the clear bit.

We would not change

A dedicated work pair

“Screens are a big part of your day, but you haven't reported difficulty or the tell-tale habits — so there is no compelling reason to change this yet. Worth revisiting if that changes.”

When it says this: Screens are a big part of your day, but you have reported no difficulty and none of the habits.

02

Separate reading glasses

What it would otherwise have been: STOTTS. Everyday

We would not change

Separate reading glasses

“Your varifocals already carry your near vision and you have not reported reading difficulty — a separate reading pair would mostly duplicate what you have.”

When it says this: You wear varifocals and have not reported reading difficulty.

03

Prescription sunglasses

What it would otherwise have been: STOTTS. Light

We would not change

Prescription sunglasses

“You're not outdoors much and bright light doesn't trouble you.”

When it says this: You told us you are not outdoors much and bright light does not trouble you.

04

Sports lenses

What it would otherwise have been: STOTTS. Active

We would not change

Sports lenses

“You play now and then rather than every week — sport-specific eyewear is not indicated.”

When it says this: You play now and then rather than weekly or a few times a month.

05

A dedicated driving pair

What it would otherwise have been: STOTTS. Drive

We would not change

A dedicated driving pair

“You drive relatively little and rarely after dark — no separate driving pair is indicated at this stage.”

When it says this: You drive relatively little, or without reporting particular difficulty, and rarely after dark.

A coating we don't add by default

A filter coating is a conversation, not a default.

“We do not suggest a filter coating simply because you use screens.”

A coating is chosen for a reason you gave us — reflections, scratches, glare after dark, reading in dim light — and never added because a questionnaire noticed screens. If you have been offered a filter coating elsewhere and want an honest view of what it does and does not do, we have written one.

The rule we work to

The least complex solution that properly addresses the identified need.

That is the rule every Lens Profile recommendation is held to — and it is why the honest outcome is sometimes no configuration at all. That route is called Keep — no new configuration, and it reads like this:

When nothing you told us earns a change: your current set-up, kept, with what is working said out loud. That is a real answer, not a soft one.

We would rather tell you that than sell you a configuration.

The other honest route is an examination before any lens — for a reported change in vision, distance clarity on the road, or anyone who wears nothing yet. Neither route names a configuration, and neither is a soft answer.

STOTTS. Lens Profile

Find out what we would — and wouldn't — change for you.

Three minutes about your day, and the profile tells you where a configuration would earn its place — and where it would not.

Book appointment